Robert Knudsen
Roots and Branches: The Quest For Meaning And Truth In Modern Thought.
Edited by Donald Knudsen.
380 pp. ISBN 978-0-88815-206-0.
Reformational Publishing Project/ Paiedia Press, 2009.
http://www.amazon.com/asin/dp/088815206X
http://www.amazon.co.uk/asin/dp/088815206X
Reformational Publishing Project/ Paiedia Press are leading the way in getting reformational books into readers' hands at a great price. This is book comprises a series of articles by Robert Knudsen compiled by his son Donald. it also has an appreciative introduction from William Edgar.
The range and scope of the articles are testimony of Knudsen's wide areas of interest. Knudsen studied under Cornelius van Til and S. U. Zuidema. From 1958 he taught at Westminster theological Seminary where he taught apologetics and courses on Dooyeweerd's philosophy (for an outline of the syllabus see here), His main area of expertise was on existential theology (his Masters was on Tillich, Niehbuhr and Berdyaev). All three of these areas are reflected in this compilation.
CONTENTS
Foreword by Donald Knudsen
Introduction by William Edgar
PART I: THE ORIGINS OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT
"Calvinism as a Cultural Force," in John Calvin: His Influence in the Western World. W. Stanford Reid, editor. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1982, 13-29.
"Apologetics and History," in Life Is Religion. Henry Vander Groot, editor. St. Catherines: Paideia Press, 1981, 119-133.
"Roots of the New Theology," in Scripture and Confession. John Ski1ton, editor. Philadelphia: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1973, 247-273.
PART II: DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THEOLOGY AND APOLOGETICS
"Analysis of Theological Concepts: A Methodological Sketch," in Westminster Theological Journal. 40, Spring, 1978, 229-244.
"May We Use the Term Theonomy?" in Theonomy: A Reformed Critique. William S. Barker & W. Robert Godfrey, editors. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990, 15-37.
"The Transcendental Perspective of Westminster's Apologetic," in Westminster Theological Journal. 48, Fall, 1986, 223-239.
"Progressive and Regressive Tendencies in Christian Apologetics," in Jerusalem and Athens. Robert Geehan, editor. Philadelphia: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1971, 275-298.
PART III: ANALYSES OF MODERN THEOLOGIANS
"Crosscurrents," in Westminster Theological Journal. 35, Spring, 1973, 303-314.
"Symbol and Reality in Nicolas Berdyaev," in Westminster Theological Journal. 24, November, 1961, 38-47.
"The Ambiguity of Human Autonomy and Freedom in the Thought of Paul Tillich," 4-part series in Philosophia Reformata. 32 (1967) 55-67, 33 (1968) 32-44, 34 (1969) 38-51, 37 (1972) 3-25.
"Transcendental Motives in Karl Jaspers' Philosophy," in Philosophia Reformata. 34 (1969) 122-133.
"Rudolf Bultmann," in Creative Minds in Contemporary Theology. Philip E. Hughes, editor. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1966, 131-162.
PART IV: AN ASSESSMENT OF HERMAN DOOYEWEERD
"Transcendental Method in Dooyeweerd," in Anakainosis. 1/3, April, 1979, 2-8.
"The Religious Foundation of Dooyeweerd's Transcendental Method," in Contemporary Reflections on the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd. D.F.M. Strauss and Michelle Botting, editors. Lewiston, Queenston, Lampter: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000, 271-285.
"Dooyeweerd's Philosophical Method," mimeographed lecture delivered at Annual Philosophy Conference, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, Oct. 13, 1962.
"Phiiosophia Reformanda: The Idea of Christian Scientific Endeavor in the Thought of Herman Dooyeweerd," in Reflections on the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd. Mimeographed text, Westminster Theological Seminary, 1968.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bibliography Of The Writings Of Robert D. Knudsen, in Westminster Theological Journal. 58, Spring, 1996, 111-121.
Friday, 26 February 2010
Thursday, 25 February 2010
Saturday, 20 February 2010
Walking in the Way of the Word - H. Evan Runner
Walking in the Way of the Word
The Collected Writings of H. Evan Runner Volume 2
Paidea Press, 2009
ISBN 0-88815-203-3
(Published by the Reformational Publishing Project)
This is volume 2 of the Collected works of H. Evan Runner; rather perversely it appears before volume 1! Runner was a professor of philosophy at Calvin College until his retirement in 1981. This collection comprises his two main books: The Relation of the Bible to Learning and Scriptural Religion and Political Task. Both have long been out of print, so it is great to see them available again.
Both these works originated as lectures in 1959 and 1961 at Unionville. They are stimulating and inspiring reading.
http://www.amazon.com/asin/dp/0888152035/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/asin/dp/0888152035/
The Collected Writings of H. Evan Runner Volume 2
Paidea Press, 2009
ISBN 0-88815-203-3
(Published by the Reformational Publishing Project)
This is volume 2 of the Collected works of H. Evan Runner; rather perversely it appears before volume 1! Runner was a professor of philosophy at Calvin College until his retirement in 1981. This collection comprises his two main books: The Relation of the Bible to Learning and Scriptural Religion and Political Task. Both have long been out of print, so it is great to see them available again.
Both these works originated as lectures in 1959 and 1961 at Unionville. They are stimulating and inspiring reading.
http://www.amazon.com/asin/dp/0888152035/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/asin/dp/0888152035/
Saturday, 13 February 2010
Review of Biblical Prophets and Contemporary Environmental Ethics by Marlow
Biblical Prophets and Contemporary Environmental EthicsRe-Reading Amos, Hosea, and First Isaiah
Hilary Marlow
Oxford University Press, 2009
978-0-19-956905-2
338pp +xvi
Academic tomes have a tendency to be boring, inaccessible to non-specialists, without cultural relevance beyond the ivory tower and have unaesthetic covers. This book defies the stereotype in every way. Despite being the product of a Cambridge PhD, under Katherine Dell, it is readable, accessible, and will have an impact within and without the academia - and has a great cover to boot!
Hilary Marlow has been associated with most British evangelical organisations. She is a director of Director of the John Ray Initiative, has been involved with A Rocha for over a decade, until recently she was a Research Associate in Theology and Science at the Faraday Institute, has written for the Jubilee Trust and Grove Books and is at present involved in a project with the Kirby Laing Institute for Christian Ethics based at Tyndale House, Cambridge. She has also found time to complete her PhD and this book is the product of that.
The first chapter takes an overview of creation in church history, it is a broad brush view but is full of insight - I made a long list of further avenues to explore as a result of it. She starts - rather predictably - with Lynn White Jr's critique before looking at some theological perspectives on creation. This stems from the early church with its Greek influences to Calvin via the Cappodocians and Aquinas. She mentions that Irenaeus sees Adam typologically, but I'm not certain that this is a true picture. Tony Lane argues that 'Irenaeus's theology is undermined more than most others by the suggestion of a non-historical Adam' (Darwin Creation and the Fall p. 141). This, of course is a minor quibble.
She draws upon a number of important secondary sources including Glacken, Harrison, McGrath, Santmire.
Chapter 2 takes the historical perspective on from the sixteenth century. She looks at the divide between history and nature. Von Rad and Eichrodt are singled out for their Hegelian influences which allows them to set up a dualism of nature and history. Following Brueggeman, Marlow agrees that this led to an abandonment and marginalisation of serious thinking about the creation in biblical theology.
Two theologians helped to reverse this trend: Bernhard Anderson and Claus Westermann. As a result many others challenged the setting up of history over creation. Theodore Hiebert, Ronald Simkins and William Brown an three that Marlow briefly focuses on. She rightly notes that these three have helped towards a corrective reading of the Old Testament.
The developoment of an ecological hermeneutic is the subject of chapter 3. Here Norman Habel's Earth Bible Project (EBP) is examined. Taking a cue from feminist theologies the EBP stands with the oppressed Earth in dialogue with the text.
The emphasis on methodology and the methodoogy itself is criticised. As Marlow points out Bouma-Preideger comes up with a similar but more biblically robust set of guidelines. Following Christopher J. H. Wright's hermeutical triangle God (Israel/humanity and Land/ earth) she forms an ecological triangle: God at the apex and a base of humanity and the non-human creation. It is the interrelationship between these three vertices that are examined in the next three chapters. Three important questions are also posed (p. 111):
1. What understanding of the non-human creation does the text present
2. What assumptions are made about YHWH's relationship to the created world and how he acts in it?
3. What effect do the actions and choices of human beings have on the non-human creation and vice versa?
Chapters 4-6 look at Amos, Hosea and Is 1-39 in light of these questions and the ecological triangle. She provides a detailed exegesis and analysis of key passages from these prophets. In Amos the non-human creation plays an important role, 'the natural world engages in a "dialogue" with its creator' (p 157). In Hosea it has less of a role and the emphasis is on God and humanity, but this relationship when broken does have a marked effect on the earth. Finally, in Is 1-39 there is a link between humanity, God and the rest of creation in that 'natural' disaster is a consequence of disobedience to God and this broken relationship is shown in metaphors and parables of the natural world.
The final chapter looks at the implications of the foregoing for an environmental ethic. Here she starts by providing a broad overview on using the Bible in ethics. The issue of how we move from the scriptures to any ethic is problematic. I was suprised to read a criticism of Walter Kaiser, she writes 'His study is based on a high view of biblical authority, and this theological perspective colours his selection and interpretation of texts' (p. 248). All theological perspectives are coloured, theology is never neutral. It left me wondering what is Marlow's view of the authority of scripture and how has that has shaped her choice of passages?
She then turns to environmental ethics in particular. She looks at some key issues; including: what is the value ascribed to the non-human creation? Is it intrinsic or instrumental? Is nature a stable entiry or in flux? and the tension between nature and culture. She concludes that the prophets recognise instrumental value but also give the non-human creation a value that is greater than any utilitarian one. She does not address the issue of how anything can have intrinsic value, unless it is value given to it by God - and in which case it is not intrinsic. For the other issues she sees an ambiguity in the prophets.
Few other books have examined the Old Testament in the light of the current environemtal issues. Two other books are by Cyril Rodd Glimpses of a Strange Land (T&T Clark, 2001) which deals with some individual texts and Chris Wright's Old Testament Ethics for the People of God (IVP, 2004) which takes a broad brush approach. Marlow's book is an example of how to interpret scripture in the light of contemporary issues and how to understand contemporary issues in the light of scripture. It shows that we have not exhausted the scriptures in what it can say to environmental ethics. As Marlow concludes:
'it is vital that the church be better informed of the rich contribution of its own scriptures to a positive understanding of the creation as a basis for raising awareness of environmental issues and promoting good practice amiong its own members and the wider community'.
I wholeheartedly agree.
Contents
Foreword by John Barton
Introduction
1: Creation in Church History
2: Nature Versus History: An Artificial Divide
3: Ecological Hermeneutics: Meaning and Method
4: Who Can But Prophesy? Creation Dialogue in the Book of Amos
5: The People do not Know: Covenantal Failure in the Book of Hosea
6: The Vineyard of the Lord of Hosts: YHWH, the People and the Land in Isaiah 1-39
7: The Old Testament Prophets and Environmental Ethics: A Dialogue
Publisher's website
Available in the UK from:
amazon.co.uk
eden
book depository
Friday, 12 February 2010
Odds and sods
An illustrated Dooyeweerd? and here
This looks like an interesting book: The Making of an Atheist by Jim Spiegel [HT The Beretta Blog]
Reviews of Jacob Klapwijk's Purpose in the Living World? by Tony Jelsma and by Mark William Westmoreland
N T Wright for Everyone
An interview with Alvin Plantinga
The great Trinity debate coming soon - some resources

This looks like an interesting book: The Making of an Atheist by Jim Spiegel [HT The Beretta Blog]
Reviews of Jacob Klapwijk's Purpose in the Living World? by Tony Jelsma and by Mark William Westmoreland
N T Wright for Everyone
An interview with Alvin Plantinga
The great Trinity debate coming soon - some resources

Thursday, 11 February 2010
Resources for a Christian approach to biology
Roy Clouser. 2001. Is Theism Compatible with Evolution?. In Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives, Ed. Rob Pennock. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001), 513-536.
J. J. Duyvene De Wit. 1965. 'The Impact of Herman Dooyeweerd’s Christian Philosophy upon Present Day Biological Thought'. In Philosophy and Christianity: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Professor Dr. Herman Dooyeweerd. W F De Gaay Fortman et al. (eds), Kampen: J.H. Kok. pp 405-433.
E. L. Hebden Taylor. 1967. Evolution and the Reformation of Biology: A Study of the Biological Thought of Herman Dooyeweerd of Amsterdam and J. J. Duyvene de Wit. Craig Press.
Russell Maatman. 1993. The Impact of Evolutionary Theory: A Christian View. Dordt: Dordt College Press, 1993.
Danie F.M. Strauss. 200. Did Darwin initially develop a theory of evolution in the biological sense of the word? South African Journal of Philosophy 26(2): 190-203
J. J. Duyvene De Wit. 1962. ‘Organic Life and the evolutionistic world and life view’ Christian Perspectives 1962. Guardian Publishing Company: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J. J. Duyvene De Wit. 1965. A New Critique of the Transformist Principle in Evolutionary Biology. Kampen: J.H. Kok.
Richard Gunton. 2006. 'Reformational Perspectives on the Evolution Controversy' ReformationalUK blog.
E. L. Hebden Taylor. 1967. Evolution and the Reformation of Biology: A Study of the Biological Thought of Herman Dooyeweerd of Amsterdam and J. J. Duyvene de Wit. Craig Press.
Russell Maatman. 1993. The Impact of Evolutionary Theory: A Christian View. Dordt: Dordt College Press, 1993.
Arthur J. Jones. 2002. 'The Identity and Nature of the Created Kinds – Speciation among Cichlid Fish'. Leicester: Genesis Agendum.
Jacob Klapwijk. 2008. Purpose in the Living World?: Creation and Emergent Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jan Lever. 1958. Creation and Evolution, Grand Rapids: International Publications. (Translation of Creatie en Evolutie, Wageningen, 1956)
M. D. Stafleu. 'The Idionomy of Natural Kinds and the Biological Concept of a Species' Philosophia Reformata, 65 (2), (2000): 154-169.
M. D. Stafleu 'Evolution, History, and the Individual Character of a Person', Philosophia Reformata, 67 (1), 2002: 3-18
Danie F.M. Strauss. 2003.The “Copernican turn” of biology in the 20th Century. Acta Academica 35(3):49-76.
Danie F.M. Strauss. 200. Did Darwin initially develop a theory of evolution in the biological sense of the word? South African Journal of Philosophy 26(2): 190-203
Danie F.M. Strauss. 200. Biotic analogies – a threat to scholarly reflection? Acta Academica 28(3): 29-5
Danie F.M. Strauss. 2001. The Effect of Ultimate Commitments on the Content of the Natural Sciences – with special Reference to Biology as a Discipline. Journal for Christian Scholarship 37 :89-105.
Danie F.M. Strauss. 2009. Did Darwin get over the First Hurdle? (lacking evidence for the assumed origination of “life”) Journal for Christian Scholarship 45 (3): 1-32.
Danie F.M. Strauss. 2009. Did Darwin get over the Second Hurdle? (the problem of constancy amidst change), 2009 Journal for Christian Scholarship 45 (3): 77-95
Sytse Strijbos. 1996. 'The Concept of the ‘Open System’ – Another Machine Metaphor for the Organism?'. In Facets of Faith and Science. Vol. 3, The Role of Beliefs in the Natural Sciences Ed. J. Van der Meer. Lanham: University Press of America , Ch 10.
Sytse Strijbos. 1996. 'The Concept of Hierarchy in Contemporary Systems Thinking – a Key to Overcoming Reductionism?'. In Facets of Faith and Science. Vol. 3, The Role of Beliefs in the Natural Sciences. J. Van der Meer (ed.), Lanham: University Press of America, Ch 14.
Rene van Woudenberg Darwinian and teleological expanations: are they incompatible?
Magnus Verbrugge. 1984. Alive: An Enquiry into The Origin and Meaning of Life, Vallecito, California: Ross House Books, 1984, pages xviii, 139
Magnus Verbrugge. 1979. Evolution and the biotic aspect of reality Anakainosis 2 (1) September: 2-7
Uko Zylstra. 1981. ‘Dooyeweerd’s concept of classification in biology’. In Life is Religion: Essays in Honor of H. Evan Runner. Paideia: St Catherine’s.
Uko Zylstra. 1992. Living Things as Hierarchically Organised Structures. Synthese 99: 111-13
Uko Zylstra. 1996. The Influence of Evolutionary Biology on Hierarchical Theory in Biology, with Special Reference to the Problem of Individuality, in Facets of Faith and Science,vol. 2, The Role of Beliefs in Mathematics and the Natural Sciences: An Augustinian Perspective Ed. J. Van der Meer, Lanham: University Press of America. Ch 13,
Uko Zylstra. 2004. Intelligent-Design Theory: An Argument for Biotic Laws. Zygon, 39 (1); 175-191
Friday, 5 February 2010
New on All of life redeemed
Update of Bruce Wearne's Annotated Jim Skillen bibliography for Feb 2010
Added to the Roy Clouser pages:
2009. A Brief Sketch of the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd Axiomathes (Journal of the Mitteleuropa Foundation).
2009. Transcendental Critique Revisited and Revised Philosophia Reformata Volume 74 (1)
Added to the Roy Clouser pages:
2009. A Brief Sketch of the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd Axiomathes (Journal of the Mitteleuropa Foundation).
2009. Transcendental Critique Revisited and Revised Philosophia Reformata Volume 74 (1)
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
New on my Google Reader RSS feed
These are blogs I've recenlty subscribed to using Google reader.
+ Science and values
A newish blog by "A group of Christian theologians and scientists concerned about truth and values in science and society."
Old Testament ethics
This is the webpage for the “Old Testament Ethics: Principles of Living for the People of God” adult learning community at Cornerstone Christian Church.
Sandhedsvidne: 'witness to the truth'
Blog by Angelo Shoun Franklin for Prague
Jazz Notes by Doug Groothius
A reflection on jazz, the universe and life
Teaching Redemptively
A reflection on grace-based education
Crime genre by J Mark Bertrand
Meditations on a life of crime by Rethinking Worldview and Back on Murder author
+ Science and values
A newish blog by "A group of Christian theologians and scientists concerned about truth and values in science and society."
Old Testament ethics
This is the webpage for the “Old Testament Ethics: Principles of Living for the People of God” adult learning community at Cornerstone Christian Church.
Sandhedsvidne: 'witness to the truth'
Blog by Angelo Shoun Franklin for Prague
Jazz Notes by Doug Groothius
A reflection on jazz, the universe and life
Teaching Redemptively
A reflection on grace-based education
Crime genre by J Mark Bertrand
Meditations on a life of crime by Rethinking Worldview and Back on Murder author
Monday, 1 February 2010
Odds and sods
Mike Wittmer on evangelical philosophers
Calvinism for the 21st century a Conference at Dordt College (8-10 April 2010)
A list of CPYU Bookshelf interviews including J Mark Bertrand and Jim Belcher
Gabe Lyons via Bob Robinson on Influencing culture
Reviews and interviews: DTK [Desiring the Kingdom by Jamie Smith] around the web

Calvinism for the 21st century a Conference at Dordt College (8-10 April 2010)
A list of CPYU Bookshelf interviews including J Mark Bertrand and Jim Belcher
Gabe Lyons via Bob Robinson on Influencing culture
Reviews and interviews: DTK [Desiring the Kingdom by Jamie Smith] around the web

Sunday, 31 January 2010
Thursday, 28 January 2010
A bibliography on a Christian approach to sport
updated 22 Sept 2018.
John Byl and Tom Visker Physical education, sport and wellness. Sioux Center, IA : Dordt College Press, 1999.
Contents:
- The Bible and the body: a Biblical perspective on health and physical education / John Cooper
- The Incarnation and the flesh / Bud Williams
- Somatospiritual model: a biomechanist looks at the Bible / Brian W. Bergemann
- Transforming wellness: linking spiritual concepts to personal health / Timothy J. Voss
- Spirituality and wellness: student perspectives / John Byl
- Attitudes of member institutions of the Coalition for Christian Colleges and Universities (USA) towards required health and fitness courses in the core curriculum / Allison J. McFarland
- Developing an aim-centered K-12 physical education program based on Christian tenets / Marvin A. Zuidema
- Leadership theory as it applies to academic work / Beth A. Easter and Dale E. Gibson
- Sport education: more necessary than ever / James Timmer, Sr.
- Intentional integration of scripture into the study of sport sociology / Allison J. McFarland
- Christian sports and leisure: oxymoron or redundancy? / Carl E. Zylstra
- We coach "Play the whistle" but what happens when the whistle breaks? / Gregory Gidman and David Turkington
- Sport ethics via Thoreau / Douglas Hochstetler
- A reflection on the moral value of interscholastic athletes / Calvin P. Van Reken
- Pressure to win? But I'm a Christian coach at a Christian college / Karol Hunt
- Moral reasoning: what is it and how it is best accomplished in the classroom and gymnasium / Sharon K. Stoll
- The effects of religiosity, education and experience on the moral reasoning levels of NCAA division III male head athletic directors / James R. Timmer, Jr.
- Senior student's perspectives on physical education and sport / Murray W. Hall
- Calvinism and Mennonites :a pilot study on SPEPHERDing Christianity and sport in Canada / John Byl
- A contrast between physical activity in the early church and muscular Christianity: what implications does this have for the 21st century? / Dale E. Campbell.
P Heintzman, G A van Andel and Tom Visker 1994. Christianity and Leisure: Issues in a Pluralistic Society. Sioux Center, IA: Dordt College Press
ContentsSection One: Biblical and historical perspective
- Work and play: a Biblical perspective / Robert K. Johnston
- Implications for leisure from a review of the Biblical concepts of Sabbath and rest / Paul Heintzman
- The Puritan ethic and Christian leisure for today / Leland Ryken
Section Two: Methodological issues
- Toward a Christian perspective in the leisure sciences / Gordon Spykman
- Leisure science, dominant paradigms, and philosophy: the expansion of leisure science's horizon / Paul Heintzman
Section Three: Present practices and challenges in leisure
- Whatever happened to the leisure revolution? / Gordon Dahl
- Leisure and the New Age movement / Glen E. Van Andel
- Contemplative leisure within Christian spirituality / Joseph D. Teaff
- Leisure at L'Arche: communities of faith for persons with developmental disabilities / Cathy O'Keefe
- Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot / Don DeGraaf
Section Four: Play, sport, and athletics
- Sport, play, and leisure in the Christian experience / Shirl J. Hoffman
- Coming to terms with play, game, sport and athletics / John Byl
- Play, game, and sport in a Reformed, Biblical worldview / Tom Visker
- Atheletics from a Christian perspective / Marvin A. Zuidema
- Towards an understanding of 'muscular Christianity': religion, sport, and culture in the modern world / James A. Mathisen
- Competition in Church sport leagues / Kimberly A. Keller, Gary H. Naylor, and David R. Stirling
- Christian ethics in North American sport / Murray W. Hall
Section Five: Leisure and culture
- From the Super Bowl to worship: the roles of story in work and leisure / Quentin J. Schultze
- From faith to fun: humor as invisible religion / Russell Heddendorf
- Leisure, drama, and Christianity / Gwen Laurie Wright.
Brian Bolt. 2018. Sport, Faith, Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Calvin Shorts.
Robert Ellis 2014. The Games People Play: Theology, Religion, and Sport. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
P Heintzman, G A van Andel Christianity & Leisure II: Issues for the twenty-first century. Sioux Centre, IA: Dordt College Press.
Lincoln Harvey 2014. A Brief Theology of Sport. London: SCM.
Lincoln Harvey, A Christian perspective on sport. https://www.uniontheology.org/resources/doctrine/the-holy-spirit-and-the-christian-life/a-christian-perspective-on-sport
Shirl James Hoffman 2010. Good Game: Christianity and the Culture of Sports. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press
Robert K. Johnston 1997. The Christian at Play. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Jim Parry, Mark Nesti and Nick Watson 2013. Theology, Ethics and Transcendence in Sports (Routledge Research in Sport, Culture and Society). London: Routledge.
Clifford Putney 2003. Muscular Christianity: Manhood and Sports in Protestant America, 1880-1920. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Mark Roques. 2003. Fields of God: Football and the Kingdom of God Carlisle: Authentic.
B J van der Walt. 2007. 'Spotlight on sport: a Christian-worldviewish philosophical reflection'. Transforming Power. Potchefstroom: ICCA, ch 13
Tom Visker 2002. Just do it right: the experience of shalom in sport participation. Pro Rege 30:17-21.
Tom Visker 1992-93. Sports participation in a Reformed biblical worldview Christian Educators Journal 32 (Dec 92/ Jan 93): 6-7 and 18-19.
T. L. Visker & S. J. Hoffman.1999 Leisure, Play, Game and Sport in a Christian Perspective Dordt College Press.
Nick J. Watson and Andrew Parker (eds.) 2015. Sports and Christianity: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Routledge Research in Sport, Culture and Society). London: Routledge.
Nick J. Watson and Andrew Parker. 2014. Sport and the Christian Religion: A Systematic Review of Literature. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
D F M Strauss. 2005. Philosophical Perspectives on Leisure, Play and Sport. In: Relativity and relativism: historical and systematic considerations. In: Acta Academica Supplementum. 2005(2):199-231 Journal for Christian Scholarship, Year 40, 4th Quarter (pp.149-168)
Marvin A. Zuidema 2006. Foundational thoughts on a Christian philosophy of play, sports and athletics. Pivot
Useful websites:
Sunday, 24 January 2010
Jack Dee on the CofE
"The Church of England for me had always been like an elderly relative that I felt I should visit from time to time."
Jack Dee Thanks for Nothing Doubleday: London , 2009, p. 167.
Friday, 22 January 2010
Thursday, 21 January 2010
Tuesday, 19 January 2010
Monday, 18 January 2010
Jesus is coming: plant a tree
Slides for my talk below
Jesus Returns 2 Pet 3
View more documents from Steve Bishop.
The return of Jesus: plant trees!
What would you be doing now if you knew Jesus was coming tomorrow?
Luther, when asked a similar question said: "I would plant a tree today."
Why would he want to do that?
Will what we do now make a difference after Jesus has returned?
If it does then planting a tree is important.
Our role as image bearers of God is not to populate heaven!
If it was all we would have to do is get someone to pray the sinners prayer and then kill them.
The Bible is clear Jesus is returning. How do we then behave? How do we then respond? Does it matter what we think about Jesus’ return? Eschatology, the study of the end times, is it important?
For many the idea is that we are waiting around on an earth which is a training ground for eternity, waiting for Jesus to come and whisk us away so that we can be with him in a mansion in heaven. The earth will be destroyed, time will end and we will be in heaven for ever.
That view has nothing to do with the Bible - it is a reading into the Bible of pagan Greek ideas. It is wrong on nearly every single point!
Eschatology does affect what we do now. It affects the priority we place on culture, business, politics, science and so on.
In the passage we had read (2Pe 3) Peter writes:
1 Dear friends, this is now my second letter to you. I have written both of them as reminders to stimulate you to wholesome thinking.
Wholesome thinking - thinking is important. How do we renew our minds? - part of the answer is given here: “I have written...”: the scriptures. We need to soak and marinade in the scriptures, then our minds can be renewed, become wholesome. Like a jazz musician we will then be able to improvise and develop ideas in the way they were intended to go.
Peter goes on in verse 2
2 I want you to recall the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets and the command given by our Lord and Savior through your apostles.
There are 31,124 verses in the Old and New Testaments, and of these 8,352 are predictive prophecy, almost one third! In fact only four biblical books contain no predictive prophecies: Ruth, Song of Songs, Philemon and 3 John. The emphasis in the scriptures on prophecy is itself justification enough to study it and the end times.
When it comes to theology and eschatology in particular many Christians complain that there are too many terms to understand; and yet we can walk into the Coffee shop and order a coffee - what's going on? expresso, frappacino, baby cino, latte, americano, skinny, how many terms do we have to get our minds around to get a cup of coffee?
So, rather than look at coffee terms, most of which I suspect you will all know I want to look at some theological terms. If we order a coffee we can do theology.
There are four main views regarding theology. All centre around what’s been called the millennium - a period of a 1000 years mentioned in Rev 20.
2. Millennial views (see slides)
A key question is: What about culture? How much will make it in at the return of Jesus.
Does planting a tree now have any lasting influence when Jesus returns. Does it matter what job we do as long as we evangelise and practice singing in church for heaven?
What will be the fate of the earth? Will art, science, poetry, commerce make it into the new earth?
There are two apparently opposing views:
Annihilation or transformation
Discontinuity or continuity.
Renewal or destruction
There are a number of verses that suggest destruction and a number that suggest renewal.
In this passage Peter describes the return of Jesus as the earth being destroyed. The writer to the Hebrews, echoing the psalmist, talks about the earth and heavens perishing and being rolled up like a garment, and Jesus says that heaven and earth will pass away.”
On the other hand we have Romans 8 suggesting a liberation not a destruction.
Acts 3: 19-21 restoration of all things apokatastastaseos panton suggest at Christ's return the creation will be restored to its original perfection.
How do we reconcile these conflicting accounts? Is it restoration or destruction?
In many ways the scriptures can sometimes be like those 3D images - to make the image 3D each eye must see something slightly different, when these are then re-focused a new image appears. We have to take these conflicting images and refocus them.
The first thing we need to remember is that these passages may not necessarily have to be taken literally; they may well be metaphors to describe the catastrophic and cataclysmic event the return of Jesus will be.
Let us examine three passages that talk about an apparent destruction of the earth.
(i) Matthew 24:35: ‘heavens and earth will pass away’ (cf Mk 13:31; Lk 21:33).
The Greek word ‘pass away’ is the same word that occurs in 2 Corinthians 5:17, where Paul describes the person in Christ as a new creation, saying ‘the old has gone’ (literally passed away). This implies not total destruction but transformation. Hence we could legitimately paraphrase Jesus as saying ‘heaven and earth will be transformed but my word never changes’.
(ii) Hebrews 1:12
The word translated as ‘changed’ in v12 is the same word is used in 1 Corinthians 15:51 and 52. Here the context is the resurrection of believers: ‘we will all be changed’. Yet again the meaning can be understood as transformation. When we receive resurrection bodies we shall not be destroyed but changed or transformed; in the same way the earth will be transformed.
Now we come to this tricky passage.
(iii) 2 Peter 3:10
The KJV has “the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up
This was a translation of a word (katakaēsetai) from one particular manuscript (Textus Receptus) version of the passage- recent discoveries have found that a more accurate version of the original (Codex Sinaticus and Codex Vaticanus) comes from a different Greek word (heurethēsetai) meaning: ‘will be found’. The emphasis is not on destruction but on disclosure.
The context here is Noah’s flood. The water purified the earth, the water removed not Noah and his family but evil and the wicked. In the same way fire is used time and again in the scriptures to denote a purification. In fact the language used here is a metallurgical one - the purification of metals by fire. Fire doesn’t destroy the metal it purifies it. So, the new earth will be disclosed, transformed, purified and redeemed.
Jesus’ return then will mean some massive changes – there will be a judgment. However, the earth won’t be destroyed. It will be changed in a similar to which our bodies will be changed, but we will still be us and the earth will still be the earth, albeit a new and redeemed earth.
So, how does that affect what we do now? Should we be planting trees?
It’s interesting to note that in Rev 21 a brilliant description of the new heaven and earth. The imagery isn’t us going to heaven but heaven coming to earth. [Incidentally do you know how many times the phrase ‘going to heaven’ (or similar) is used in the scriptures? None!]
But in verse 24:
And in Is 60 – the imagery which Revelation has borrowed:
What are these ships of Tarshish? They were large trading ships – why are they here in the holy city, the new Jerusalem?
They were the objects of God’s wrath in Is 23 and yet they appear here.
Richard Mouw writes:
The ships of Tarshish represent pagan commerce and yet they seem to under go a purging and appear in the new Jerusalem.
In the same way all our acts will also undergo a breaking, a purifying. Culture will be transformed and be a part of the new earth. What we do now has eternal consequences.
Some of you may be thinking: nothing matters but the kingdom – and by that you think of prayer, worship, Bible study, personal piety and so on. But God would say, because of the kingdom everything matters! Art, history, poetry, wiork, science, business – everything matters.
There was once an engineer – he wanted to be Christian in all that he did. He was accurate in all his measurements, he worked hard, never stole from work, even bought his own paperclips, when he photocopied his own things – he worked extra to cover the costs, he shared his faith with his co-workers. It wasn’t until later he realized he’d been helping build the Tower of Babel.
Nothing matter but the kingdom – but because of the kingdom everything matters.
So, if Jesus were to return tomorrow what would you do tonight? Let’s plant trees!
Trees of culture, commerce, politics, art, …. It matters.
Our original mandate was to fill the earth – that includes a cultural filling.
Jesus is coming – plant trees!
Luther, when asked a similar question said: "I would plant a tree today."
Why would he want to do that?
Will what we do now make a difference after Jesus has returned?
If it does then planting a tree is important.
Our role as image bearers of God is not to populate heaven!
If it was all we would have to do is get someone to pray the sinners prayer and then kill them.
The Bible is clear Jesus is returning. How do we then behave? How do we then respond? Does it matter what we think about Jesus’ return? Eschatology, the study of the end times, is it important?
For many the idea is that we are waiting around on an earth which is a training ground for eternity, waiting for Jesus to come and whisk us away so that we can be with him in a mansion in heaven. The earth will be destroyed, time will end and we will be in heaven for ever.
That view has nothing to do with the Bible - it is a reading into the Bible of pagan Greek ideas. It is wrong on nearly every single point!
Eschatology does affect what we do now. It affects the priority we place on culture, business, politics, science and so on.
In the passage we had read (2Pe 3) Peter writes:
1 Dear friends, this is now my second letter to you. I have written both of them as reminders to stimulate you to wholesome thinking.
Wholesome thinking - thinking is important. How do we renew our minds? - part of the answer is given here: “I have written...”: the scriptures. We need to soak and marinade in the scriptures, then our minds can be renewed, become wholesome. Like a jazz musician we will then be able to improvise and develop ideas in the way they were intended to go.
Peter goes on in verse 2
2 I want you to recall the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets and the command given by our Lord and Savior through your apostles.
There are 31,124 verses in the Old and New Testaments, and of these 8,352 are predictive prophecy, almost one third! In fact only four biblical books contain no predictive prophecies: Ruth, Song of Songs, Philemon and 3 John. The emphasis in the scriptures on prophecy is itself justification enough to study it and the end times.
When it comes to theology and eschatology in particular many Christians complain that there are too many terms to understand; and yet we can walk into the Coffee shop and order a coffee - what's going on? expresso, frappacino, baby cino, latte, americano, skinny, how many terms do we have to get our minds around to get a cup of coffee?
So, rather than look at coffee terms, most of which I suspect you will all know I want to look at some theological terms. If we order a coffee we can do theology.
There are four main views regarding theology. All centre around what’s been called the millennium - a period of a 1000 years mentioned in Rev 20.
2. Millennial views (see slides)
A key question is: What about culture? How much will make it in at the return of Jesus.
Does planting a tree now have any lasting influence when Jesus returns. Does it matter what job we do as long as we evangelise and practice singing in church for heaven?
What will be the fate of the earth? Will art, science, poetry, commerce make it into the new earth?
There are two apparently opposing views:
Annihilation or transformation
Discontinuity or continuity.
Renewal or destruction
There are a number of verses that suggest destruction and a number that suggest renewal.
In this passage Peter describes the return of Jesus as the earth being destroyed. The writer to the Hebrews, echoing the psalmist, talks about the earth and heavens perishing and being rolled up like a garment, and Jesus says that heaven and earth will pass away.”
On the other hand we have Romans 8 suggesting a liberation not a destruction.
19The creation waits in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed. 20For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God.
Acts 3: 19-21 restoration of all things apokatastastaseos panton suggest at Christ's return the creation will be restored to its original perfection.
He must remain in heaven until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets.
How do we reconcile these conflicting accounts? Is it restoration or destruction?
In many ways the scriptures can sometimes be like those 3D images - to make the image 3D each eye must see something slightly different, when these are then re-focused a new image appears. We have to take these conflicting images and refocus them.
The first thing we need to remember is that these passages may not necessarily have to be taken literally; they may well be metaphors to describe the catastrophic and cataclysmic event the return of Jesus will be.
Let us examine three passages that talk about an apparent destruction of the earth.
(i) Matthew 24:35: ‘heavens and earth will pass away’ (cf Mk 13:31; Lk 21:33).
35Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.
The Greek word ‘pass away’ is the same word that occurs in 2 Corinthians 5:17, where Paul describes the person in Christ as a new creation, saying ‘the old has gone’ (literally passed away). This implies not total destruction but transformation. Hence we could legitimately paraphrase Jesus as saying ‘heaven and earth will be transformed but my word never changes’.
(ii) Hebrews 1:12
"In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.
The word translated as ‘changed’ in v12 is the same word is used in 1 Corinthians 15:51 and 52. Here the context is the resurrection of believers: ‘we will all be changed’. Yet again the meaning can be understood as transformation. When we receive resurrection bodies we shall not be destroyed but changed or transformed; in the same way the earth will be transformed.
Now we come to this tricky passage.
(iii) 2 Peter 3:10
The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare.
The KJV has “the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up
This was a translation of a word (katakaēsetai) from one particular manuscript (Textus Receptus) version of the passage- recent discoveries have found that a more accurate version of the original (Codex Sinaticus and Codex Vaticanus) comes from a different Greek word (heurethēsetai) meaning: ‘will be found’. The emphasis is not on destruction but on disclosure.
The context here is Noah’s flood. The water purified the earth, the water removed not Noah and his family but evil and the wicked. In the same way fire is used time and again in the scriptures to denote a purification. In fact the language used here is a metallurgical one - the purification of metals by fire. Fire doesn’t destroy the metal it purifies it. So, the new earth will be disclosed, transformed, purified and redeemed.
Jesus’ return then will mean some massive changes – there will be a judgment. However, the earth won’t be destroyed. It will be changed in a similar to which our bodies will be changed, but we will still be us and the earth will still be the earth, albeit a new and redeemed earth.
So, how does that affect what we do now? Should we be planting trees?
It’s interesting to note that in Rev 21 a brilliant description of the new heaven and earth. The imagery isn’t us going to heaven but heaven coming to earth. [Incidentally do you know how many times the phrase ‘going to heaven’ (or similar) is used in the scriptures? None!]
But in verse 24:
The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their spleandour into it. .. the glory and honour of the nations will be brought into it.
And in Is 60 – the imagery which Revelation has borrowed:
3 Nations will come to your light,
and kings to the brightness of your dawn.
9 Surely the islands look to me;
in the lead are the ships of Tarshish,
bringing your sons from afar,
with their silver and gold,
to the honor of the LORD your God,
the Holy One of Israel,
for he has endowed you with splendor.
10 "Foreigners will rebuild your walls,
and their kings will serve you.
Though in anger I struck you,
in favor I will show you compassion.
11 Your gates will always stand open,
they will never be shut, day or night,
so that men may bring you the wealth of the nations—
their kings led in triumphal procession.
What are these ships of Tarshish? They were large trading ships – why are they here in the holy city, the new Jerusalem?
They were the objects of God’s wrath in Is 23 and yet they appear here.
Richard Mouw writes:
My own impression is that the judgement that will visit the ships of Tarshish is of a purifying sort. We might think here of the ‘breaking’ of the ships of Tarshish as more like the breaking of a horse rather than the breaking of a vase. The judgment here is meant to tame, not destroy. The ships of Tarshish will be harnessed for service in the Holy city – a process that will require a ‘breaking’ of sorts.
The ships of Tarshish represent pagan commerce and yet they seem to under go a purging and appear in the new Jerusalem.
In the same way all our acts will also undergo a breaking, a purifying. Culture will be transformed and be a part of the new earth. What we do now has eternal consequences.
Some of you may be thinking: nothing matters but the kingdom – and by that you think of prayer, worship, Bible study, personal piety and so on. But God would say, because of the kingdom everything matters! Art, history, poetry, wiork, science, business – everything matters.
There was once an engineer – he wanted to be Christian in all that he did. He was accurate in all his measurements, he worked hard, never stole from work, even bought his own paperclips, when he photocopied his own things – he worked extra to cover the costs, he shared his faith with his co-workers. It wasn’t until later he realized he’d been helping build the Tower of Babel.
Nothing matter but the kingdom – but because of the kingdom everything matters.
So, if Jesus were to return tomorrow what would you do tonight? Let’s plant trees!
Trees of culture, commerce, politics, art, …. It matters.
Our original mandate was to fill the earth – that includes a cultural filling.
Jesus is coming – plant trees!
Sunday, 17 January 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




